Skip to content
LumenCore

Advocacy Collective Asserts to Have Scraped Countless of Music Tracks from Spotify

A digital rights group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them online.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers noted the seeming data breach could boost AI companies looking for data to develop their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full catalog.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a external actor collected public metadata and used questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Group's Declared Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ rights, said the leaked music would probably be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated data is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online repository of pirated books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.

The writer

Glenda Sherman

A lighting designer with over 15 years of experience in sustainable architectural projects across North America.

LumenCore

Type to search articles.